What do the phrases "Four legs good, two legs bad" imply about animals and humans?

The phrase "Four legs good, two legs bad" reflects a fundamental belief in the novel that contrasts the qualities and moral standing of animals against those of humans. It simplifies the animals' perspective by suggesting that since animals have four legs, they are inherently good, while humans, who have two legs, represent corruption and badness. This slogan encapsulates the animals’ collective resentment towards humans, portraying them as oppressors and exploiters.

The correct choice emphasizes the view that animals, embodying innocence and virtue, are morally superior to humans, who are characterized as selfish and greedy. As the story unfolds, this dichotomy serves to critique the way in which leadership and ideology can distort moral values, making the animals and their cause seem noble compared to the perceived flaws of human beings. This understanding of the phrase also lays the groundwork for examining themes of power, corruption, and the struggle for equality within the narrative.